-
Shigeki Matsuyama returns to StolenSpace Gallery with his new solo show 'Quiet Circulation' bringing together works that meditate on our everyday encounters with images and information.

Last time we worked together was in 2024 for your solo exhibition Portraits of Dazzle. How has your practice developed since then?
Although I have not yet been able to present them publicly, I spent much of 2025 producing a large number of new works. Of course, the 'Portraits of Dazzle' series remains very popular, so in countries or regions where it has not yet been shown, I continue to organise exhibitions centred on that series, allowing audiences who have not previously encountered the works to experience them for the first time.That body of work centred on placing eyes onto the silhouette of another person. In 'Quiet Circulation', however, there are works where you’ve removed the eyes entirely, leaving only the silhouette. What motivated this shift, and what draws you to these more pared-back forms?Within the 'Portraits of Dazzle' series, the works without “eyes” are those themed around bots. In the standard works (with eyes), I use a video projector to precisely trace only the eyes from countless facial photographs—selfies and snapshots—uploaded to social media. I then redraw the outline of the portrait based on a real individual, but alter elements such as race, gender, hairstyle, and body type so that they differ entirely from the original source. Through this process, I explore the anonymity and uncertainty of information on the internet. By contrast, the eyeless works themed around bots depict entities that, like Siri or Alexa, possess a human-like presence through anthropomorphised communication. As these bot works do not have a real human model, unlike the 'Portraits of Dazzle' series, I do not paint eyes. Instead, I present them with “(bot)” appended to the end of the title.
In some of your new works, figures are depicted holding weapons. To what extent is this imagery shaped by the current global political climate, and how does it inform the way you conceptualise and articulate your work?Directly speaking, they are not influenced by the current global political situation. As I hope will become clearer in my response to the next question, the 'Clipping' series addresses the spread of fake news and the role of bots. Since much bot-driven misinformation relates to politics and war, I draw upon motifs from paintings that deal with those themes.
These pieces were created through a dialogue with ChatGPT. Could you share what motivated you to engage in this exchange, and how you view the role of AI in the creative process?Only the 'Clipping' series was produced through dialogue with ChatGPT. This series, which centres on the spread of fake news, expresses phenomena observed in the early stages of misinformation circulation—such as the use of bots to enhance credibility, or the detachment of information from its context through AI generation—by cutting fragments from well-known historical paintings. From the initial stages of production, I developed the imagery in consultation with the conversational AI ChatGPT.
In the 'Clipping' series, because the works are created through dialogue with AI, the AI frequently produces hallucinations and provides me with incorrect information. I deliberately incorporate these inaccuracies into the work. Of course, I cannot verify the accuracy of every piece of information myself; during the process, there may well be instances in which I unknowingly accept and reflect AI-generated misinformation. In this sense, AI is not merely a tool in this series but the subject itself. The completed works therefore contain elements that even I do not fully understand.
'Quiet Circulation' runs until March 15th, 2026.
To Request a list of available works, please click here.
View show in 3D here.
-
A reflection of his experiences, Keya Tama’s practice unites his heritage and personal allegories with ancient iconographies and modern folklore, to create a body of work that is minimalistic in form yet loaded with symbolism.
Surrounded by art and creativity from the minute he was born, it’s no surprise that Keya Tama was a practicing artist and muralist from a very young age. Influenced by the artistic communities and sub-cultures that his parents, street artist Faith XLVII and tattoo artist Tyler B. Murphy, were part of, Keya had exhibited his own work and published a graphic novel before his thirteenth birthday. From there, he began to develop his own distinct voice, through travelling with his mother, absorbing diverse global influences and engaging with artistic communities across the globe.
A reflection of his experiences, Keya Tama’s practice unites his heritage and personal allegories with ancient iconographies and modern folklore, to create a body of work that is minimalistic in form yet loaded with symbolism. Using pastel colours and motifs of people, animals and nature to tell stories of past and present, Keya’s work moves beyond personal expression, creating a visual language that maps collective histories, bridges modernity and tradition and explores the universal rhythm of human experience.
The Three Goodbyes explores a journey of departure, confrontation and return. What first inspired you to examine this narrative? What are you trying to communicate with your audience?
The show is very much inspired by a lot of my community in terms of the artists I know, who have moved from their home countries, resettled, and then moved many times since. This kind of transient experience of living and making homes again and again, having this collective community that’s all spread out. It’s an experience of joy and excitement, but also it’s quite a difficult thing to piece together. It’s quite a relatable experience that I share with a lot of my friends and collaborators, so it definitely ties into that.

Since beginning your practice, you have worked under various monikers - Jack Fox, Cashril Plus - later deciding to go by your given name. What made you take this decision, and how does it speak to the journey of leaving behind the familiar, seeking the challenge of uncertainty and returning home with renewed understanding, that is traced throughout this exhibition?
My very early work was very inspired by my parents who were deep into graffiti, so my initial names were inspired by that. I had more street art influences and alter egos that resembled that sort of more contemporary street art scene. As I got older, I wanted to be able to give myself room to make work that was more personal. I think having my name - Keya Tama is actually my first and middle name, so there’s still a separation between myself and the work, but it is a lot more personal. It’s nice to have that and I feel I can explore many mediums without restriction.

As a multidisciplinary artist, is there a particular medium you are most drawn to, or one you are interested in exploring in the future?
So I am very inspired by ceramics. I just did a residency with the Royal Delft Museum and it reinvigorated my interest in the medium, so I am looking into doing more of that, as well as tapestry work and wood carvings. I imagine collaborating with people more and more, in multiple directions. I’m especially interested in doing more tile installations with murals and want my murals to have more three-dimensionality.
How have the various countries, cultures and artists you have interacted with throughout your life influenced your practice and the art you create?
Since a young age, I was travelling a lot because of my mum who is a muralist. I would go on these different trips and every time I felt like there was something that stayed with me. Over time you realise it was these loose links of fragments of the past, all these ephemeral things that were starting to disappear, especially art that had such warmth to it. Just as time moves fast, I’m more drawn to subtlety of the past and contrasting that with elements of contemporary design. To me that kind of balance, having a yin and yang to express something, that can hold more subtle emotions and distill them.

A large focus of The Three Goodbyes is the idea of connection, collaboration and belonging. Could you tell us about some previous collaborations, and how they have influenced the way you approach art-making?
Collaboration has been a huge part of my practice since I was young, and a huge part of that is inspired by my parents [Faith XVII and Tyler B. Murphy] who are very community focused and have grown a lot because of who they’ve collaborated with throughout their lives. It’s quite fitting that they’re both included in this show, alongside my studio-mate Kevin Cincotta and Elléna Lourens and Joshua Martel and Angel Lopez, who are such great artists. It’s quite a warm feeling having that element to the show too, to resemble these people who have meant a lot to me and influenced my practice.

How does music inform your practice? What do you typically listen to when creating work both in the street and in the studio?
Whenever I travel I always try to find old music from that area, so a lot of underground youth-culture bands that show the newness of things that exist. Besides that I listen to a lot of audio books and philosophy books - primarily Carl Jung and a lot of Murakami books. They’re really nice for encapsulating a long period of time within a project, so that you feel like there's another layer to reality. I’m really inspired by South African music too, especially since leaving, as it’s a nice way to feel connected to things that are happening.
View 'The Three Goodbyes' exhibition here.
-
Through my paintings, I'm trying to break down any boundaries between digital aesthetics and the analogue historical tropes of oil painting. I like challenging the dichotomy, as the digital screens slip onto the canvas and back again.
Looking back at our group exhibition 'Rendered Reality' we sat down with some of the exhibiting artists to talk about some of the running themes in the exhibition.
How does digital technology influence your creative process, and at what stage does the transition from digital to physical typically occur?
Digital technology has always informed my practice. It is often the first step in my painting process, whether beginning with a photograph, a digital collage, or more recently, AI and algorithmically generated imagery. Once I've mocked the painting up digitally, I mark it up on a canvas and begin the painting process.

In what ways do you see your work contributing to or challenging the boundaries between traditional painting and digital aesthetics?
Painting, particularly oil painting, is such an analogue process consisting of organic mediums and tools. The process of applying minerals and pigments from the earth to a naturally grown cotton or linen canvas with a brush made from wood and animal hair could not be more of an analogue process. I have always been interested in how this process remains to be not only culturally relevant, but a significantly culturally dominant art form in such a digitally driven and tech based society. Through my paintings, I'm trying to break down any boundaries between digital aesthetics and the analogue historical tropes of oil painting. I like challenging the dichotomy, as the digital screens slip onto the canvas and back again.

What role do you think digital mediums like CGI, 3D, and AI play in reshaping the boundaries of traditional art? Do you see digital media as an extension of traditional craftsmanship or something entirely different?
Artist's have always been early adopters of new technologies, exploring their possibilities and utilising them in ways that they were not necessarily initially designed for. Creative applications of technologies is a very useful and unconventional way of exploring new tech and its boundaries, as well as exploring its functions and associated ethics. It is also a mutually beneficial relationship, where new technology creates new aesthetics and becomes another tool to be used in the studio to help realise conceptual frameworks and develop new work.
Your work moves between analogue and digital modes—what draws you to explore the tension or harmony between these two realms?
I feel there is a slippery harmony between analogue and digital modes of image making. A jpeg on a screen has the same flatness and aesthetics as a painting on canvas, just as easily as the painting can be digitalised into a jpeg on the screen. I think the relationship between the two is an obvious evolution of painting in the digital age. The tension I like to explore is painting's ability to allow the viewer to slow down and contemplate a single image in such a fast based stimulating world driven by mass digital image consumption. The analogue output of painting, particularly when viewed in a gallery context, encourages a much longer contemplation and experience of an image then what exists online.

How do you navigate the balance between precision often associated with digital tools and the tactile imperfections of traditional, hand-painted techniques?
I believe it is paintings hand made quality, both in process and aesthetics, that gives the medium its continued relevance in contemporary culture. There is an innate value to the hand made object, and painting lends itself to a rejection of technology in its process. The tactile imperfections of a painting are to be embraced, and I often find myself getting up close to paintings to see the hand of the artist and mark making. It's also an interesting process transferring AI generated images and textures onto a canvas with paint. -
I’m interested in how visual “mistakes” generated by algorithms can become emotionally charged once they’re rendered in material form.
Looking back at our group exhibition 'Rendered Reality' we sat down with some of the exhibiting artists to talk about some of the running themes in the exhibition.
How does digital technology influence your creative process, and at what stage does the transition from digital to physical typically occur?
Digital technology is a fundamental tool in my creative process. Since the beginning of my career as an illustrator and designer, I’ve worked extensively with digital programs. I like having tools available for every stage of the process — from the initial idea to the final piece. Even so, I always start with hand-drawn sketches; that gesture remains essential to me.
What gives me confidence today is precisely the combination of digital and manual work. I use AI as a starting point — not as an end in itself — to explore visual errors, glitches, and distortions. I digitally manipulate these images until I find something that resonates emotionally or conceptually. That’s when the transition to the physical begins: I turn those visuals into paintings, stained glass, weavings, or sculptures. This isn’t a simple translation — it’s a reinterpretation through matter. Making the image tangible gives it new life, and the act of working with different materials makes this entire process much more exciting.
In what ways do you see your work contributing to or challenging the boundaries between traditional painting and digital aesthetics?
Where do you gather source materials and references for your work? Can you share a specific digital tool, software, or aesthetic that has shaped your recent practice?**Right now, my creative process is deeply shaped by dream experiences and my relationship with medicinal plants. These experiences generate internal images and narratives — sometimes poems, haikus, or short stories — which I then distill down to a core image or idea. That image is what I feed into AI, using it as a base to begin shaping the visual language.
The glitch, the error, the unstable — these are key aesthetics for me. I work with digital results as a starting point and then begin translating them into physical media: painting, stained glass, textiles, sculpture. I’m interested in how visual “mistakes” generated by algorithms can become emotionally charged once they’re rendered in material form. I believe my work challenges and contributes to the dialogue between traditional painting and digital aesthetics by allowing both to coexist and inform each other.
For me, materializing digital images is a way of grounding the virtual in the body. That friction — between the perfection of the machine and the imperfection of the hand — is where the work comes alive.What does “Rendered Reality” mean to you personally, and how does your work reflect this evolving relationship between the virtual and the tangible world?
“Rendered Reality” evokes that ambiguous space where the virtual becomes material — and vice versa. In my practice, that transition is always present. I often begin with imagined images — surreal landscapes, flowers, cacti — which I develop through AI. These digital images, often dreamlike or uncanny, are then transformed into physical objects loaded with texture, time, and human imperfection.I’m especially interested in how the intangible — like a glitch or distortion created by an algorithm — can gain a spiritual or emotional quality when translated into stained glass or tapestry. For me, materializing digital images is a way of grounding the virtual in the body. That friction — between the perfection of the machine and the imperfection of the hand — is where the work comes alive.
What role do you think digital mediums like CGI, 3D, and AI play in reshaping the boundaries of traditional art? Do you see digital media as an extension of traditional craftsmanship or something entirely different?
I don’t believe digital media replaces craftsmanship — it expands it. I see AI, CGI, and 3D tools as part of a broader creative process that is still deeply rooted in intuition and handwork. For me, these digital tools are just like another brush: a means of exploration, not the core of the work. The artist’s idea remains central.What interests me most is using these tools from a chaotic, unpredictable place — searching for accidents, glitches, and unexpected outcomes that can trigger new directions. From there, I rework those discoveries in physical form. In that sense, digital media can be a contemporary extension of craftsmanship, offering new ways of working with the hand — even if it’s through the machine.
Do you ever find the limitations of AI frustrating or do they serve as creative constraints in your practice?
I actually find the limitations of AI quite inspiring. Rather than seeing them as obstacles, I treat them as creative constraints — unpredictable boundaries that force me to think differently. When AI produces awkward or unexpected results, I don’t correct them. I embrace those imperfections as entry points into new visual languages.
These limitations often generate the glitches, distortions, or misreadings that have become essential to my aesthetic. They open a space where I can dialogue with the machine — not to perfect an image, but to break it open. From there, I can begin the process of reinterpretation and transformation through physical media. In that way, the AI’s limitations actually enhance the experimental nature of my work.
I see the digital realm as a space of exploration, where ideas can emerge quickly, erratically, and without fear. It’s a kind of sketchbook for the subconscious. But I always return to the material — to the gesture, the weight, the time of making.

How do you personally define your relationship with digital art versus physical art, and how do both inform your identity as an artist
For me, digital and physical art are not separate — they’re deeply interconnected. I see the digital realm as a space of exploration, where ideas can emerge quickly, erratically, and without fear. It’s a kind of sketchbook for the subconscious. But I always return to the material — to the gesture, the weight, the time of making.
The physical translation is where my identity as an artist truly grounds itself. Working with glass, textiles, or paint requires slowness, attention, and care — a kind of presence that balances the speed and abundance of digital tools. This duality is central to who I am: I move between worlds, constantly shifting from imagined to embodied, from coded to crafted.
-
Looking back at her first solo exhibition at StolenSpace Gallery, we caught up with Goto to discuss her creative process, childhood dreams and the cultural and spiritual beliefs that imbue her practice with presence and meaning.
For artist Goto Atsuko, painting itself is a form of dreaming. Her time studying in Paris (2007-2009) and the profound impact of witnessing the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake greatly inform her practice. In her imagined landscapes, she reflects on cultural virtues of selflessness, resignation, and obedience that, beneath their quiet surface, carry an undertow of desperation.
Her compositions unfold as beautifully unsettling visions: ghostly figures entwined with nature, embodiments of the emotions that move beneath both the conscious and unconscious mind. Dark tones pierce through muted palettes, underlining the transience and fragility of life, and at the heart of these spectral worlds are guuzou: idols, empty vessels onto which desires, prayers, and curses are projected. While some may worship talents or virtual characters in today’s rapidly shifting culture, these objects remain only variations of the same empty guuzou. Like the dream that unfolds beyond conscious control, the guuzou resists alteration: loved, feared, yet forever untouchable.
What does your creative process look like? Could you walk us through the journey of a piece, from its initial spark to completion?
I usually take notes on things that interest me, words that catch my eye, events close to me, and news from Japan and abroad. I think about what moves me emotionally and inspiringly. When I decide to paint something, sometimes I have a clear theme, and other times it's vague.
I search for ornaments, weapons, and clothing from art museum archives around the world, mixing and arranging pieces from various regions and eras to incorporate them into my paintings. As I paint, I consider the overall balance, adding elements and thinking about colours.
Either way, I start by drawing a rough sketch. Then, erasing and painting, I search for a way to connect with my sensibilities and see if what emerges on the canvas resonates with my sensations at that time. If I feel something is good, I begin painting without deciding on the details, incorporating my current sensations into the painting. I decide the details as I paint. Because I paint by soaking the paint into the fabric, it is impossible to completely erase the paint once it has been applied, but because I work with very diluted paint, I can make corrections as I go. I make watercolours by mixing pigments with gum arabic. Increasing the amount of gum arabic allows me to create transparent layers of colour. In addition to synthetic pigments, I also make paints using natural mineral pigments (powder made from crushed rocks, which has coarse particles and good colour development), as well as gold and silver powder. I also use paint refined from real lapis lazuli, carefully layering it to create a thin film to create the texture of the figures' skin. (I prepare a lot of paint in advance and dissolve it in water only as needed.) I search for ornaments, weapons, and clothing from art museum archives around the world, mixing and arranging pieces from various regions and eras to incorporate them into my paintings. As I paint, I consider the overall balance, adding elements and thinking about colours. I'm not sure if it's finished, but I consider a piece to be complete when I feel like I can't paint any more.
What do you listen to when you’re in the studio - music, silence, or something else? Are there any artists or sounds that influence your creative atmosphere?
When I'm creating, the music I listen to changes depending on the stage of the painting. I often prefer complete silence at the beginning, but when I'm working on the long, detailed parts of the final stages of production, I often listen to up-tempo music like pop, or anime or dramas (with a lot of auditory information and dialogue). I also listen to storytelling on podcasts or the radio. When I find music that syncs with the work I'm drawing, I sometimes listen to it over and over again. I discovered the music of J.A. Caesar (the composer who worked on film and stage music for Shuji Terayama) when I was in junior high school, and it had a big impact on me, and I still listen to it today. I also listened to a lot of classical music when I was younger. I particularly like Stravinsky's "The Soldier's Tale." I also often listen to piano pieces by Chopin and Debussy.
Your chosen materials and application methods give an ethereal, almost translucent quality to your work. Could you talk about a specific piece where you explored this approach, how you arrived at it, and what aspect of working in this way you most enjoyed?
I began painting oil paintings in high school in preparation for the entrance exams to Japanese art university. I continued painting oils throughout college, but at some point, I began using them as if they were water-based paints. After studying art materials in the Tokyo University of Arts and studying abroad in France (Ecole des Beaux-art de Paris), I came into contact with a variety of materials and one day, by chance, discovered the technique of painting with watercolours on cotton fabric. This technique perfectly suited my temperament and nature, and it gave me a mysterious confidence that simply painting would become "my own painting." It's incredibly exciting and moving to witness the phenomena that occur when the cotton fibres, water and paint particles, and my own senses intertwine.
I believe that everything is two sides of the same coin. Life and death, hope and despair may seem like two opposing things, but I see them as one. I want to express things that contain opposing things.Your figures personify dreams, passions, prayers, and even curses. How do these inner experiences - whether a dream you’ve had, or a prayer or curse you’ve released - manifest in your work? Could you share one that has lingered with you, perhaps even from childhood, and how it continues to shape your artistic practice?
I've loved drawing since I was a child. Rather than playing outside and exercising, I preferred to immerse myself in the world of art. As a teenager, I became interested in anime and manga, tried my hand at drawing, and was inspired by my friends who also loved to draw. My family relationships were a bit complicated, so I think drawing was a way to release the resentment, hatred, anger, and frustration I was harbouring. I think drawing was more of a salvation for me than I realised. I've had dreams from time to time since I was a child. A common pattern was that I would visit a theme park-like place with family or friends that I'd visited as a child but didn't quite remember, and then I would suddenly find myself alone, searching for everyone but unable to find them. Another memorable dream was one in which I don't remember the details of the dream, but it was so comfortable that I woke up with the absolute desire not to return to reality (not to wake up). Experiences like this sparked my interest in the mysterious human activity of dreaming, and I became drawn to works that had dreams as their theme.Your work examines the balance of existence: beauty and decay, hope and despair, life and death. How do you see the goddess of creation and death reflected in your practice, and what draws you to this duality?
I believe that everything is two sides of the same coin. Life and death, hope and despair may seem like two opposing things, but I see them as one. I want to express things that contain opposing things.
Solitude and emptiness are central themes in your practice. Do you see these as pathways toward connection or spiritual reflection, and in what ways has Shinto shaped how you perceive and depict the world in your art?
I don't belong to any particular religion, but I think it's true that I naturally incorporate the spirituality of Shinto and Buddhism. Unlike monotheistic religions, in which everything converges around an absolute centre, Shinto is said to have a spirituality in which the centre is empty, yet everything continues to revolve around that empty centre. The characters I paint are not depicting anyone; they are depicted as beings who could be anyone, but at the same time, no one. I believe that the vague, dream-like settings without a clear purpose or conclusion are an expression of these values.Often, the figures in your work are women. What role do women play in your cosmology, and why do they carry these prayers, dreams, and burdens in your work?
Perhaps the biggest reason I paint many women is because I am a woman myself. My works are not self-portraits, but all could be described as "self-portrait-like." Women are "just living creatures" just like men, but I grew up feeling anger, pain, and dissatisfied with the social status and role of women in modern society, and these feelings continue to this day. I want to resist the absurdity of such a society, and I think that is reflected in the characters in my works.View 'The Dreams of Wandering Despair' exhibition here. -
We sat down to talk with Spanish artist duo PichiAvo on their solo exhibition 'Chromata', their new mural in London and exploring innovative techniques.

This exhibition marks your return to London after 7 years. How does it feel to be back?
Avo: London was the first city that truly believed in us so coming back is always special. Our last show with StolenSpace was in 2020 but we couldn’t attend due to the pandemic that's why this return feels even more meaningful. This time we're coming back with a new body of work and new techniques that we're really excited to show – it's been two years since we started the first piece.
Pichi: London was the city where we first had the opportunity to show our art, it always makes us happy to return to London and share our new techniques and evolution.

What was it like painting the mural in Wandsworth?
Avo: We always enjoy painting, especially when we share our new concepts. It's an enriching process where we learn a lot and the audience can see how the mural comes to life, from the graffiti background to the classical character. This time, it's inspired by "Discobolus," a Greek sculpture hosted in the British Museum, which is our way of connecting the work to the place where we are.
Pichi: It was interesting to show the evolution on our work. It's also always nice to see people's reactions as they pass by and look at it.

We like the idea of uncovering what's already there, but hidden, like when you look at old painted shop windows, or walls full of layers, and history.
It would be great to talk about a specific work in more detail. Is there a piece in this exhibition that you feel is essential to your practice, and why?
Avo: In Chromata we present the Krystallika Chromata series. A new technique we have developed whilst keeping our usual drawing style, though this time we were inspired from what we see on the streets, especially shop front windows. It's like an archaeological act: when you remove something, something new appears. We like the idea of uncovering what's already there, but hidden, like when you look at old painted shop windows, or walls full of layers, and history.
Pichi: All the pieces have something interesting, from the play with colors and gradients to the compositions.

This body of work is an exploration of the presence and absence of colour. Could you talk more about this chromatic contrast?
Avo: We don't see presence and absence, or colour and greyscale as opposites. We look for the balance between all the elements: the colour, graffiti, and the classical figure. We want the viewer to see everything on the same level. We don't try to make the figure more important than the graffiti or the colour, because for us, everything exists together. We invite people to follow the colors and experience the work the same way we do.
Pichi: It’s a study of colour on how it changes when placed on grey, inspired by the Flemish technique.

In the end what matters to us is staying true to our essence adapting our new language to any surface or scale while keeping the same spirit that defines our work.
Can you explain the role of scale in your work? For example, the glass works are smaller than the paintings - what difference does scale have on an artwork?
Avo: The challenge is always to keep your essence no matter the size, it's about knowing how to apply the techniques according to the surface you're working on. In the case of the glass pieces even though it's something new for us and the technique is new, the style is very connected to our drawing on paper, so we managed to keep our essence even with the change on the surface. In the end, what matters to us is staying true to our essence adapting our new language to any surface or scale while we're keeping the same spirit that defines our work.

View 'Chromata' exhibition here.
-
Connor Gottfried on the rebellious act of 'play', reconnecting with the child within us.
You have previously cited various influences on your creative journey: the Apple II computer brought home by your dad in 1982, books on BASIC programming, and even the punk music scene. Could you share how you progressed from an interest in computation to where you are now?
It has definitely been a winding path. When I first saw what a computer could do when I was 5 years old, my mind was absolutely blown. I discovered that I had an ability to understand and work with computers right away and my brothers and I started programming simple games as jokes. At an early age, I saw computers as a fun and powerful creative tool, and that laid the foundation for me as an artist.

In my teenage years I lost interest in computers and my focus turned towards skateboarding, snowboarding and music. The skateboarding scene had such a vibrant and rebellious culture and we’d watch VHS copies of the early skate videos and, through this, were exposed to so much great music and art. Skateboarding was free, playful, rebellious and unconcerned with rules – this really resonated with me. We started a punk band when I was a teenager and in my 20s this evolved into an improv band that incorporated punk, jazz, psych, hip-hop, and electronic into genre-mashing tracks. We’d record long stretches of improvisation and then I would edit the material into finished songs. We ended up releasing 25 albums in total and some of them did well on Canadian college radio. We toured Europe/UK in 2007 (played Manchester, Leeds, Brussels and Berlin) and this work really informed my current process of combining improvisation with computer editing when making art.
My recent works may seem quite structured (computer-cut aluminum for example), but the process to arrive at this stage is definitely one of improvisation and experimentation. I love the interplay between computer-controlled accuracy and hand-made imperfection.
How long does it typically take to finish a piece? Could you walk us through the process from ideation to creation?
The full process to take a piece from initial inspiration to completed work usually takes about a month. I always try to stay open in my daily life to new ideas and write down a lot of notes when I have something interesting. Once I have a concept, I work and rework it in Photoshop until it does justice to the initial vision. This can involve scraping paint or glueing paper to canvases and then photographing these elements and working them back in to the digital design. I’m inspired by early pop-art like Bridget Riley so I often use patterns like Blaze 1 (1962) or I may incorporate mathematical constructs like Wolfram’s Rule 30 (which symbolizes the creation of complexity from simple steps). At this point, I’ll bring the layers into After Effects so I can make the project 3D and I can spin it around to look at it from all angles to see how the layers interact. I’ll iterate back and forth until I’m satisfied and then I prepare the final files for printing and cutting into the elements used in the physical piece. The pieces either get printed on aluminum composite panelling and CNC-cut or printed on acrylic and laser-cut. Once I have everything ready to go, the final stage is to router and fold the aluminum (for the cardboard box pieces), assemble everything, glue and insert the electronics.

I think error is an amazing teacher – failures, bugs and crashes force us to discover the unexpected, improvise and stay open to change.

As technology becomes more predictive and personalized, what do you think we risk losing in our relationship to randomness, error, and surprise?
This is a fascinating question. I think error is an amazing teacher – failures, bugs and crashes force us to discover the unexpected, improvise and stay open to change. The online personalization that we’re seeing now shows us only what we want to see, but we need unexpected information to be introduced so that we can continually re-evaluate our world views and belief systems. Randomness is the mechanism that allows new things to happen (biological evolution for starters) and so if we end up with a form of algorithmic solipsism we lose the ability to incorporate new viewpoints and grow as people. Surprise is an emotion that reminds us that things aren’t always what the seem. It’s especially important in these current times to remember that even the most powerful systems of oppression and mind-control contain cracks that can be exploited.
Play is a form of rebellion against manipulation and brings us back towards our true selves.
Can you speak to the idea of ‘play’ as both a personal memory and a political act, particularly in an era when digital leisure time is often commodified or gamified?
For me, play is about freedom, creativity and joy. I think that I first realized that play was a political act when I was skateboarding as a teenager. Some of the powerful people and groups in our town tried to stop us from skateboarding by getting the police to harass us. In the current climate, I feel that play is a rebellious rejection of rules and conformity at a time when digital systems (from social media to news media) are being designed to control us and create a constant state of fear. This is no accident, fear has a powerful, disruptive effect on brain function, especially when it comes to executive function. The prefrontal cortex gets partially shut down during fear states, reducing our ability to make rational decisions and to engage in perspective-taking. Essentially, it makes us more prone to emotional manipulation. Play is the antidote to fear. It's not just fun, it transitions us into a state of connection, creativity, and regulation. It returns us to a more balanced emotional landscape, one where we are likely to make very different political decisions. Play is a form of rebellion against manipulation and brings us back towards our true selves.

When contextualising Haters you reference The Language of Emotions by Klara McLaren. How much time do you typically spend reading and researching throughout your creative process? Are there any books or texts that you could recommend for those interested in diving deeper into your work?
I read a lot, sometimes related to topics I reference in my work and sometimes not. I think reading is a really important tool for an artist as it allows you to explore, in rich detail, the experiences of other people. It's a great tool of empathy and it's so mind expanding. If someone would like to understand my work on a deeper level, one book I would recommend would be “Connections” by James Burke. This book explores the connected and surprising ways that inventions, discoveries, and ideas are linked across time. It suggests that innovation doesn’t follow a straight line, but it unfolds when the conditions are right—when the world is ready for it. Reading this helped me view technological innovations not as isolated leaps, but as part of a larger web of influence, and that continues to shape how I think about the patterns and connections in my own work.
I would love for visitors to stand in front of the pieces, play the games and not just remember, but to feelwhat it was like to play as a child.
Do you believe we’re in a moment where the boundary between artist and technologist is dissolving? And if so, what new roles or responsibilities do artists have in shaping future tech?
Yes, as we become somewhat augmented by technological tools, the boundary is blurring. That said, I think it’s important to remember that the technology is just another tool in our journey as artists to create or explore meaning. Technology is a powerful tool though, and I think artists are attracted to the possibilities it offers both in the creation and the dissemination of art. I think artists have always played a critical role in shaping technology – science fiction writers, for example, have had a profound effect on shaping the direction technology has taken over the last hundred years. Science fiction has always been a kind of blueprint for what’s possible. It’s inspired inventors, scientists, and engineers who later bring to life what they saw in science fiction as children. I’m an avid science fiction reader and this has definitely informed my work as well.

What do you want visitors to take away from Play II?
I would love for visitors to stand in front of the pieces, play the games and not just remember, but to feelwhat it was like to play as a child. If they can reconnect with that and take a little piece of it back into their everyday lives, I'd be really happy.
View PlayII exhibition here
-
Kai Clements "aka" Kai & Sunny, shared how he captures that intangible field we all exist within - The one shaped by thought, emotion and presence.
1. Could you walk us through a typical day in your studio? Do you have a routine, ritual or playlist that helps you get in a creative headspace?
My days shift depending on what needs attention in the studio and what needs prioritizing.Some mornings are spent preparing for intricate line work, mapping out compositions, or experimenting with subtle gradients that shape the energy of a piece.When I am creating work, this will consist of painting, drawing, layering and reworking.I live near the sea and stepping away for a walk is part of the process. That reset — the shift in light, the sound of the tide — often unlocks something unexpected. Ideas tend to arrive in those in-between moments, when I'm not trying to find them.The creative process can start anywhere — in nature, on a quiet walk, in a fragment of architecture, or even a piece of music. It’s about staying open and following where it leads.Some days there may be time for photographing work, organizing the studio, answering emails, or planning upcoming exhibitions."I live near the sea and stepping away for a walk is part of the process. That reset — the shift in light, the sound of the tide — often unlocks something unexpected."

2. How do you interpret the idea of “human frequencies” and how did that concept find visual form in your pieces?
“Human frequencies” speak to the invisible rhythms that move through and between us — emotional pulses, internal vibrations, even collective states of being. I’m interested in the unseen forces that connect people: intuition, mood, tension, harmony. These are not things you can touch, but you can feel them — in a room, in a relationship, even in a moment of stillness.Visually, I translated that into flowing lines, layered patterns, and shifts in density and colour. Each piece is a kind of frequency map — a visual echo of energy, both individual and collective. The repetition and movement in the line work are meant to evoke the sensation of resonance — how one frequency can influence another, how we all subtly tune into each other without realizing it.It’s about capturing that intangible field we all exist within — the one shaped by thought, emotion, and presence.“Human frequencies” speak to the invisible rhythms that move through and between us — emotional pulses, internal vibrations, even collective states of being. I’m interested in the unseen forces that connect people: intuition, mood, tension, harmony."

3. Were there any specific materials, motifs, or techniques you used in this show that were new or experimental for you?
One of the key shifts was how I approached layering — I began experimenting with different levels of transparency and motion within the line work, allowing certain forms to feel as if they’re emerging or dissolving, rather than sitting flat on the surface. It added a more immersive, almost dimensional quality to the pieces.I also explored subtle shifts in colour and how that affects how the eye moves across the composition. Some works incorporate gradients that were more intuitively built than in previous shows, allowing the flow to feel less rigid and more organic.So yes, there was experimentation — but always with the intent of deepening the connection between the viewer and the work. Sometimes the smallest shift in technique can create the most powerful change in experience.
"The line work mimics the patterns found in wind currents, tidal flows, plant growth — things that evolve over time and hold a kind of quiet power."
4. In what ways does your art serve as a medium for exploring the way nature influences the human psyche?
Nature is at the core of my work. The repetition, the movement, the chaos and calm you find in natural systems — these are mirrors of the human experience. I am fascinated by how the rhythms of the natural world affect us psychologically, often without us realizing it.The line work mimics the patterns found in wind currents, tidal flows, plant growth — things that evolve over time and hold a kind of quiet power. When you engage with these forms visually, there’s a meditative quality that can shift your state of mind. That’s intentional. I want the viewer to feel something elemental — a sense of stillness, expansion, or even disorientation — the same way standing in a vast landscape or watching a storm can alter your internal frequency.
5. Would you consider this exhibition a call to action, a reflection, or something else entirely?
This exhibition sits somewhere between reflection and resonance — it's not a direct call to action in the traditional sense, but it is a call to awareness. Human – Nature explores the unseen energy that flows through people, environments, and emotions. It invites viewers to slow down, tune in, and consider how deeply connected we are — not just to nature, but to each other.It is not shouting a message — it’s more like a frequency being broadcast quietly, asking: Can you feel this?6. What message or feeling do you hope visitors walk away with after experiencing Human - Nature?
Ideally the work to offer a kind of pause — a moment to reflect, to feel grounded or even transported. Some people might feel a sense of calm, others might feel an energetic pull or tension. That range is important. The pieces aren’t meant to dictate a single message, but to create space for individual interpretation and emotional response.Ultimately, I’d love for people to leave with a deeper sense of connection — to the natural rhythms around them, to the pulse within themselves, and maybe even to the idea that art can act as a bridge between the two. That quiet exchange, that resonance — that’s where the meaning lives."Human – Nature explores the unseen energy that flows through people, environments, and emotions. It invites viewers to slow down, tune in, and consider how deeply connected we are — not just to nature, but to each other."

"In the end, I think that friendship added a layer to the show. You can feel that push and pull — the energy between order and disruption, between fluidity and impact. That tension is what makes collaboration exciting, and having a shared history only amplifies it."
How has your long-standing friendship with D*Face shaped the collaborative process for this exhibition?
My friendship with D*Face goes way back — there’s a kind of creative shorthand between us now. When it came to this exhibition, the process was less about defining strict boundaries and more about finding where our worlds overlap and spark off each other.There’s a mutual respect — we’re coming from different visual languages, but there's a shared desire to push boundaries and communicate something beyond the obvious.In the end, I think that friendship added a layer to the show. You can feel that push and pull — the energy between order and disruption, between fluidity and impact. That tension is what makes collaboration exciting, and having a shared history only amplifies it.
-
FOR OUR 'THROUGH HER EYES' SERIES - MANON SHARED HER VIEWPOINT ON BEING A FEMALE ARTIST
1. What does it mean to be a female artist?
I am proud to be both a woman and an artist. Our ability to delve into our emotions often allows us to explore depths of creativity and introspection. The intersection of our memories and our bodies provides a unique foundation for self-expression and artistic creation. Being a woman shapes my approach to art, and my work often reflects states of confusion and uncertainty that are intrinsic to our experience. I explore complex dimensions of existence, where the image we project and our perceptions are constantly unsettled, creating an atmosphere of ambiguity and confusion. This exploration of feminine complexity—between chaos and calm—is at the heart of my practice.

2. How would you define the female gaze?
I would define the female gaze as an exploration of the emotional and experiential depth of women. Rather than focusing solely on physical appearance or sexuality, it delves into the inner world of women, capturing the richness of their emotions and experiences. The gaze on the female body is freed from objectification: it is represented authentically, without sexualization, with an emphasis on lived experience and emotional truth. In my work, I use the image of my own naked body as it is, without attempting to change it. The body becomes a witness to a reality in constant flux, reflecting moments of chaos and confusion, sometimes mixed with a search for calm amidst this turbulence. The female body becomes a place of uncertainty, a space where one is continually redefined.
3. How has your identity as a female artist influenced your artistic practice?
My identity as a female artist profoundly influences my artistic practice, as it is central to my expression. When I look within myself, I see my experience as a woman—my emotions, my traumas, my joys, and the confusion that often accompanies this existence. This inner exploration allows me to create narratives rooted in the complexity of the female condition. My work addresses the confusion between states of peace and chaos, illusion and reality. It is through this ambiguity that I express my personal story, exploring universal themes of transformation, self-perception, and survival in an increasingly blurred and uncertain world.

4. If you could lend your eyes to the viewer, what would you want them to see?
I would like them to see the beauty in moments of confusion as much as in soft and joyful moments. For me, it is these moments of oscillation between light and darkness that generate a rich and stimulating creative experience. Life is made of contrasts, and through my work, I aim to show how confusion and calm can coexist and nourish each other. I explore instability and the search for clarity in a world that often feels out of control. This struggle against uncertainty and the search for a form of inner peace in a chaotic landscape is one of the central themes in my work.

5. How does your work reflect personal or collective female experiences?
My work can sometimes seem difficult to follow, as it reflects the fluidity and confusion of my inner world. I function a bit like the changing rhythms of my hormones—one day I feel sadness, and the next, I find myself in awe of life's beauty. This alternation creates a certain confusion in my work, as it reflects the unpredictability of my own feminine cycle. My art metaphorizes emotions and states of being, producing varied atmospheres that capture moments of uncertainty, sometimes chaotic, sometimes more serene. Through the image of my blue, naked body, I try to express this inner confusion, a state where one oscillates constantly between contradictory perceptions of oneself, femininity, and the world around us.
Enquire here to receive information on available works by Manon Blet
-
For our 'Through Her Eyes' curated collection we spoke to artist Ji Zou who shared her viewpoing on what it means to be a female artist today.
What does it mean to be a woman artist?
The word woman has become increasingly nuanced in today’s social landscape. At times, it feels less like a fixed definition and more like a spectrum of identities and experiences. Because of this, my expression as a woman artist is defined by fluidity and freedom rather than rigid categorization. I don’t think too hard about being a woman in my practice—I think more about what it means to be an artist. That said, my identity as a woman is inherently present in my work because my body is deeply connected to what I create. My experiences, emotions, and history are embedded in every piece, not as a conscious effort to assert femininity, but simply as an undeniable extension of who I am.
How would you define the female gaze?
The female gaze is difficult to pinpoint, and I feel a certain discomfort with the term female itself—it’s a binary word used to describe something I see as fluid, expansive, and even infinite. Instead of viewing the gaze as strictly male or female, I see it as existing on a spectrum, resisting rigid categorizations. I admire artists across this spectrum, like Lisa Yuskavage, who plays with the aesthetics of the male gaze while maintaining a deeply personal, striking, and profound vision. Her work challenges the boundaries of what the female gaze might be, proving that it’s not simply about rejecting traditional depictions but about complicating and expanding them.
How has your identity as a female artist shaped your artistic practice?
My work is rooted in self-portraiture and the body, which is undoubtedly influenced by the legacy of many female artists before me—Frida Kahlo, Lisa Yuskavage, Yoko Ono. Their work has shaped my understanding of how the body can be a site of both personal and political meaning. I explore the relationship between my physical form and two opposing forces: the internal subconscious—the intimate, instinctual, and often hidden aspects of self—and the external world—the projections, pressures, and expectations imposed upon the body. My practice is shaped by navigating these tensions, allowing them to manifest through material, composition, and form.
If you could install your pair of eyes into the viewer, what would you want them to see?
I would want the viewer to see fluidity—the collapse of digital and spiritual realms, the tension between identity and transformation, the way intimacy and alienation can coexist. I would want them to feel the weight of history, both personal and collective, stitched into the layers of my canvases.
Most of all, I want them to sense something unnameable—a presence that exists in the spaces between form and emptiness, between the seen and the unseen.
How does your work reflect personal or collective female experiences?
My work is deeply personal, drawn from my own subjective experiences and how they have been shaped by external social structures. Though my perspective is singular, I believe that authenticity creates connection—when something is deeply felt, it resonates beyond the individual.
I align with Aimé Césaire’s idea of the universal:
"I have a different idea of a universal. It is of a universal rich with all that is particular, rich with all the particulars there are, the deepening of each particular, the coexistence of them all."
To me, this means that personal experiences, when explored with depth and honesty, can reflect something larger—a coexistence of shared histories, emotions, and realities. My work doesn’t attempt to speak for all women, but rather to explore my own experiences in a way that might illuminate something resonant for others.
To receive details of available pieces by Ji Zou please click here
-
FOR OUR 'THROUGH HER EYES' SERIES - EJITS SHARED HER VIEWPOINT ON BEING A FEMALE ARTIST
What does it mean to be a woman artist?
This probably sounds a bit trite, but you know you never really think of yourself as a woman artist you're just an artist, but to me if I am really thinking about it I guess it's about exploring your voice in the visual format, and by that I mean digging deep and seeing the things that you love, the things that sort of spark inspiration.
The things for me that I loved in childhood and don't want to let go of. A lot of my work is very cartoonish, it's about creating characters that are pleasing. I choose colours and that are like bubblegum and bright and will be really cheerful, and some of that meant exploring like this idea of femininity. A lot of my colours I suppose some people would describe as a feminine but I never really thought that we actually hated pink when I was growing up because it represented femininity and I was a tomboy! I just wanted to draw and skate and paint, and didn't really think about my gender very much.
As I came into the sphere of being in a career as an artist there was some growing sense of having to overcome the fear of taking up space as a woman and pursuing a career doing what I enjoy the most, which feels like a real privilege and then on top of that having to sort of present that to an audience and to the public so that I can make a career out of it that opened my eyes up to how women are taught to be small and not take up space, and be happy with what we've got and I didn't want to do that. I wanted to do what I loved and I think that's what that means to me as being a woman artist is getting to do what you love and getting to share your perspective with other people.
(listen here)

How would you define female gaze?
I guess female gaze as I understand it, is kind of the antidote to the male gaze, its umm where as previously the portrayal of women would be as like objects of desire, the female gaze is like portraying powerful strong women that have agency and that are real, they're not just beautiful things. In my work obviously my characters are really cartoony, they're not real people but I do try to give them life, give them agency, give them character - obviously because I'm a character creator. What I do sort of play with my in my work is gender, and I'm not very nice prescriptive when it comes to like what gender my characters are. I like to give it a little bit of ambiguity and in some instances play with gender like 'Pink Beard'. My mermaid, bearded, bright pink character - they are both male and female 'cause a mermaid is obviously usually represented as a beautiful woman with the whole shell bra thing going and 'Pink Beard' has a masive pink beard and a pirate hat and sort of takes two opposing ideals and mashes them together and that's kind of where I come from when creating a character, its umm, yeah not really prescribing a gender to it at all but I am just having fun with it!(listen here)

How has your identity as a female artist shaped your artistic practice?
As I said before I grew up as a bit of a tomboy so super identify as a very feminine woman, but through my exploration, and the things that I really love, I found, you know that I love bright colour,s I love pinks purples, teals, yellows - very feminine colours actually accidentally, I didn't mean for my work to be feminine but it sort of ended up that way. I'm really drawn to cuteness, like I really like 'kawai' Japanese character design and that's mixed with classic American animation animation. because I studied animation so I guess the feminine side of me comes through maybe more than I intended it to! The round shapes, the colours - wanting for my work to be joy and silliness with a little edge, with a little weird edge 'cause I'm interested in some sort of magic and mythology, and weirdness in general, so that's all mashed up together.In my practise itself I think I'm really aware of sort of giving and being, not of service but of - well maybe of service, like where I paint a big meal and people gain something from it they love seeing it every day because it cheers them up, like that comes into my work as an idea of like I want to put something out in the world thats positive, and joyful and that can sort of brighten someone's day and in terms of like other areas of my practice I give workshops, I want to give, I want my work to be about people finding lightness and enjoyment and learning all of that in there and I think there is something quite like naturally giving in women and females. I guess it's the caregiver in us, and I think that does in for my practice quite heavily. I want to put something out in the world that creates a positive impact on people's days, like it cheers you up, it gives you a bright sunny feeling and a bit of a giggle because you're silly that's what my work's all about.
(listen here)
To receive details of available pieces by Ejits please click here
-
FOR OUR 'THROUGH HER EYES' SERIES - AYSHA NAGIEVA SHARED HER VIEWPOINT OF BEING A FEMALE ARTIST
What does it mean to be a woman artist?
I think it’s really exciting to be a woman artist. Female artists haven’t always had the representation that we have today, which makes it super important for me to make art that I find enjoyable to make. I think as a woman you always carry the legacy of all the women before you and for that reason it’s exciting for me to unapologetically express my creative vision in my art.
How would you define female gaze?
I think the female gaze is a slightly different concept for each woman. My own female gaze is always whimsical and playful. I enjoy tapping into the high-spirited, fun-loving nature that all women start off with as girls. I try to bring that into my art as well by painting dolls that I would have loved to look at and play with as a child. Female gaze for me is always rooted in having as much fun with art as possible.
How has your identity as a female artist shaped your artistic practice?
I believe there is something intricately feminine about dolls in general. Allowing myself to experience girlhood and essentially playing with dolls in the way that seems meaningful to me through my artistic practice has been a pivotal moment for me as an artist.
If you could install your pair of eyes to the viewer what would you want them to see?
I would want the viewer to tap into their inner child when they look at my paintings. To feel that as adults we all still carry our childhood selves within and they are usually the keepers and protectors of creativity in our adult lives. I would want the viewer to experience this childhood-like feeling of excitement and wonder when they look at my pieces.
How does your work reflect personal or collective female experiences?
All of my paintings are memory capsules of different stand out moments in my life, a visual diary of sorts. I think working through memories and experiences in a creative way is super important to me. I also believe women are innately creative and we constantly find new ways to express that creativity in our everyday lives. My painting practice is a huge outlet for this.
To receive details of available pieces by Aysha Nagieva please click here -
We asked Lee Gihun to briefly introduce to us his solo SHOW 'Masquerade' – exhibited for the first time in the UK.
"It is an honour and great joy for me to hold a solo exhibition at StolenSpace Gallery in London, a venue of significant importance in the world of street art and contemporary art.
This exhibition aligns with the direction of my Masquerade series, showcasing early works created on wallpaper, as well as the previously unreleased sub-series Pietà within the Masquerade theme. I believe it will be a meaningful exhibition for those interested in my artistic world."

Photo by Gian Maitelli.
"For those encountering the Masquerade series for the first time, it may appear as fantasy or fairy-tale-like artwork, but it is actually a form of fantastic realism that metaphorically and implicitly depicts the reality we inhabit by adopting myth. My work seeks to portray a world beyond representation, capturing reality through a filter of subjective memories and emotions.
Through unique colours, textures, and the gaze created by contrasting elements, I depict the anxiety and compassion I feel toward the real world. I believe this exhibition creates a unique atmosphere and meaning as it brings together my work with the free spirit and distinctive local character of Osborne Street, where StolenSpace Gallery is located."
"I would like to express my gratitude to the gallery for curating this exhibition, where these many meanings intersect, and I hope it will be a meaningful event for those who love my art. Thank you all for your interest and support."
– Lee Gihun at StolenSpace Gallery, 2024.'Masquerade' continues online, to view available pieces please click here
-
Matsuyama spoke to us about his inspiration behind 'Portraits of Dazzle':the deceptive allure found in social media and WWI Dazzle camouflage.
What first compelled you to incorporate dazzle camouflage into your work?
I became interested in the striking appearance and narrative of Dazzle camouflage after watching a documentary about World War I. In today's society, where communication revolves around social media, it's crucial to share visually appealing information to fulfill the desire for approval through likes and follower counts. This includes using filters to enhance skin appearance, portray a slim figure, remove unnecessary elements from images, or transform cloudy skies into clear ones. The deceptive allure of posts that appear beautiful on social media, much like how Dazzle camouflage deceived enemy ships, aligns perfectly with the theme of my artwork. That's why I incorporate Dazzle camouflage as a motif in various pieces.
Dazzle camouflage was used to intentionally mislead enemies. How do you find this captures what you’re trying to explore through your portraits?
I am a contemporary artist, but in my work "Portrait of Dazzle," I play the role of both a portrait painter and a viewer of social media. In traditional portrait painting, artists and models typically interact face-to-face to complete the portrait. However, in my work "Portrait of Dazzle," the artist paints the model (a selfie on social media) through a smartphone screen. During this process, the artist and model have no personal acquaintance, and the model may not even be aware they are being depicted. This production process reflects modern communication methods.

Your practice centres around the concept of ‘modern people’ often concerned with self-image. What drew you to explore this theme in such detail?
With the widespread adoption of the internet and smartphones, our society is undergoing unprecedented changes at a pace never before experienced by humanity. I am intrigued by what "modern people" are exposed to, what they think about, and how they are evolving.
How does your background in illustration inform your practice, if at all?
My background in illustration informs my artistic practice by approaching my work not just sensually, but also rationally and theoretically. I bring a marketing perspective gained from my experience as an illustrator and designer to my activities as an artist.

You’ve recently been working on objects and installations. Do you feel this was a natural progression?
I have been creating installation artworks since around 2015, up until the early stages of the pandemic. After the pandemic made attracting audiences challenging, I began considering creating paintings that could be appreciated and purchased online, which led to the completion of "Portrait of Dazzle.”

To enquire about available work please click here
-
We had the pleasure of asking Yohta Matsuoka a few questions about his journey as a street artist and as a painter, and understand his concept of 'Sincerity' when it comes to bridging seemingly polar opposite elements on canvas.
Questions of perspective are at the centre of your work. What message are you trying to express through your compositions?
I believe that even the most mundane objects and familiar sights, like the apples frequently featured in my work, can appear different when viewed from another angle. I try to convey this by manipulating the composition of my artwork. From a broader perspective, it's about not taking things for granted and recognising that even on the most routine days, no two days are the same.
Your work makes interesting use of colour and pattern. What informs your choices when conceptualising a new piece?
The most crucial factor when creating a new piece is whether or not I feel compelled to paint it. I also ask myself if there is a compelling narrative or concept within the world I am trying to depict.

Having produced work both in the streets and on canvas, can you walk us through your creative process for each?
I haven't been as active on the streets lately! But every now and then, I might put up a sticker, or if I have a pen in my pocket, I might impulsively scribble down a thought. Or maybe just my tag. It's all about impulse and timing. Canvas work, on the other hand, is much more deliberate. First, I sketch on my iPad, digitally collaging the composition, colours, and various objects to create the image. Then I give it some time. Sometimes I notice things that bother me the next day. Once I've decided on a sketch I want to paint, it's like replicating the digital sketch onto the canvas.
Your mural work differs slightly to your work for galleries. What drew you to begin creating these slightly abstract still-life paintings?
I started this series when COVID hit and the lockdowns began. People's activities came to a halt, the city was drained of its vibrancy and people, and it felt like I was looking at a monochrome, still world. As a painter, I felt compelled to react to this unusual world, and I started by placing simple objects on a blank, monochrome canvas. Like restarting a world that had been reset. In doing so, I realised that by carefully arranging recognisable, everyday objects, I could create faces. I realised that they were both still lifes and portraits. Then, with the hope that the abnormal situation caused by COVID would eventually end, I set the time of day to be before dawn, when the sun would rise and night would turn to day. It's monochrome, dark, and unsettling, but the faces that emerge are smiling and seem to harbour positive elements.

‘Sincerity’ explores the dichotomy between classical and contemporary art. How does this reflect your artistic vision?
For the past few years, I have been painting still lifes, which could be considered a fundamental expression of art. They provide an excellent opportunity to study the characteristics of each object, such as its shape and colour, through my brushstrokes, leaving me feeling calm and serene. At the same time, I am drawn to graffiti art and urban culture, which excite me and make me feel incredibly energised. I believe that the fusion of these seemingly polar opposite elements within me represents who I am - a quiet and calm individual with a curious and active mind. By honestly embracing both aspects, I feel a sense of balance. And I believe that it is through a sincere confrontation with the canvas during the painting process that my vision emerges.

To enquire about available work please click here
-
WE TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK add fuel A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS WORKING PRACTICE AND NEW BODY OF WORK 'simply squares'
Azulejo tiles have long been an important medium for creative expression, often chronicling major historical and cultural events. What first drew you to using them in your designs? What is the significance of re-appropriating traditional crafts?
I was first drawn to the usage of the azulejo back in 2009 when I received an invite to participate in a project in my hometown of Cascais. I felt that I needed to create an artwork that would represent the heritage of this village city 650 years of history. The idea rapidly grew into something larger than just utilising the aesthetic of tiles, it became, for me, a way to express myself through the language of my ancestors, I wouldn’t say through re-appropriating, but through re-creating and re-inventing this language.
Is there a central idea you want to express through juxtaposing the aesthetics of traditional tile work with the contemporary influences that are revealed upon closer inspection?
Yes. I felt that it’s important to look to the past, remember our roots and our traditions, while having an eye in the present and in the future while looking into how we can envision art as a medium that communicates through time itself.

‘Each square harbours a story waiting to be unearthed.’ How do you decide what stories you want to tell and what characters to incorporate?
I have a very intuitive and visceral process of drawing, sometimes these stories, elements and characters are planned and I want to transmit a specific idea, but most of the times I let my hand roam free while drawing and see how the drawing itself evolves.
Your compositions are complexly layered and repetitive, often featuring rips. How do you feel this reflects on cultural identity and urban landscapes?
Working with squares has always been my challenge and specifically finding ways to disrupt the rigidity of the shape itself. The rips and layering effect allow exactly that rupture, allow the requires space for dynamism to happen. The layering effect can and has also been interpreted as a sort of peeling the layers of time, if this makes sense, allowing for the different squares to exist in the same space but in different eras.
Was it a natural progression to begin creating works on walls and in the streets?Yes it was. I started creating studio work first with the tiles. I wanted to solidify the structure of my work with the tile aesthetic, but the step to move them to the streets was quite natural. In Portugal is quite common to have building facades covered in tiles, so for me it was a natural step to take my work into the streets. I first started with very small tile pieces, but rapidly moved into stencil (and freehand spray) based murals.What does your creative process typically look like?I start with a sketch, always. This sketch, as I mentioned earlier, can be based on telling a story or just an intuitive drawing. On a second step this sketch moves to fine lining and color. From here, the artwork might go into a tile, might be adapted to a stencil, might be hand painted in a larger mural or go into a screen print. And it is usually combined with other patterns in dynamic compositions.
A lot of your murals are site-specific. How much time do you spend researching before conceptualising each piece?Correct, they are. I felt that a mural should be part of the neighbourhood or city/country where it is located, so yes I do quite a lot of research. I do a lot of online research for patterns associated with that location, either tile patterns, fabric or even architectural elements and most of the times I talk to local people that can point me in the right direction.You’ve mastered a lot of techniques - graphic design, illustration, ceramics, stencils - is there anything new you’ve been exploring, or would like to in the future?I have a very curious mind by nature and I try to keep my horizons open. Most recently, in the past 3 or 4 years I’ve been including a lot more freehand spray painting in my murals as I feel that this contributes to the richness of the composition of the murals. In the studio we have been doing some interesting partnerships with tile factories also to explore new techniques.
What made you choose the moniker you work under, Add Fuel (To The Fire)?I initially used Add Fuel To The Fire, yes. I always like that expression, not by its negative meaning, but because in my mind, my work would be the fuel that would ignite something in the art world. I then shortened to ADD FUEL simply by aesthetic reasons, it’s shorter, easier to remember. It lost a bit of the original meaning, but I believe now it also gained new meanings, different meanings open to interpretation.You’ve previously shared how collaborating with other artists forces you to think in a different way. What was it like working with D*Face to create an edition for this show?I do love to collaborate with other artists, I feel that both works become something more when combined in the best way possible and I’ve been a fan of D*Face’s work for quite a long time so the combination was quite easy to achieve. I quite enjoy the boldness of his work, the big strong elements, and this was crucial for this collaboration, combining the bold and strong with the detailed and intricate of my patterns.Enquire here to request details of available works by ADD FUEL
-
Last fall Scott Listfield and his brother took a trip to step into their ancestor's footsteps. Each painting in this show is from a stop along the way.
The Equinox
Here's a story about a wolf.It begins a long time ago when a much younger version of me went off to Europe for the first time. I studied in Italy. I walked cobblestone streets. So many cobblestone streets. I rode trains and saw places I might never see again. I came home and those journeys eventually inspired me to paint astronauts.Last fall I traveled to Europe again. From Oslo I flew to Riga, Latvia and met up with my brother at the airport, who had arrived just before me from Boston. We spent the next week traveling through Latvia and Lithuania to the places where our ancestors once lived. I didn't really have any preconceived notions as to how this part of the trip would go. There would probably be no long lost Listfield cousins to find. No one in my family is left in this part of the world. I guess I wanted to see where I come from. I wanted to walk the same cobblestone streets my ancestors once did. I didn't expect anything profound to happen. It did though.Our trip ended in Vilnius, Lithuania's very charming capital city. Arriving late, and tired from the road, we wound up by chance walking along the river that winds its way through the center of town. The sun was setting, and it was a mild September night. People were about. Lots of people. So very many people. My brother noticed it first: something was happening. That's when we saw the wolf.On the riverbank just ahead of us was a large statue of a wolf. Looming over it was an ancient castle tower, lit dramatically from below and perched precariously on a hill. As the last bit of sunlight faded, the wolf spoke.I don’t speak Lithuanian, but some quick googling revealed that the wolf was sharing the story of the founding of Vilnius. It spoke in a booming voice, with occasional pauses as music swelled. Fire from an unknown source danced around the bottom of the wolf and eventually, as the night wore on, it was engulfed in flames. Smoke and hot ash fell on our faces. I wondered if we were a safe enough distance away.As the fire subsumed, we wandered off, dazed, along the river bank with hundreds of Vilnius residents. We had just celebrated the fall equinox and the 700th anniversary of the founding of Vilnius. It felt like we had just been part of something very primeval. I felt Lithuanian. I felt pagan. I felt wolf. I returned to my hotel room, ash still on my face.Epilogue: My third great grandfather was born in the small town of Šėta, Lithuania, sometime around the year 1837. His name was Wolfe.
The Wolf House
I arrived in Oslo knowing that the show I was supposed be having there had already been canceled. Something tragic had happened with the gallery curating the show, just a few days before I left for Scandinavia. It was too late to cancel my trip, and so I went anyways, trying not to let the sadness and suddenness of that tragedy hang over me while I traveled. But once I arrived in Oslo, the dark clouds and rain felt like a reminder. It was hard to shake the feeling of sadness hanging over both me and the city. But after a day in Oslo, I was joined by another artist who was supposed to be in the show. She too, had bought a plane ticket not knowing the whole thing would be called off, and so both of us, in town for no real purpose, wandered Oslo in the rain. We tentatively talked of the tragedy. She suggested we light a candle in one of the towering cathedrals in town. Despite neither of being particularly religious, I liked this idea. We stopped at a local bakery for a light lunch, and then took a corner and found ourselves facing a cobblestone street and a small, brightly painted house. I felt my spirits begin to lift and later that day the clouds began to break and we spotted the sun over Norway for the first time.
On The Island
I spent three days in Gothenburg, a truly lovely city with canals, street cars, and countless hills on Sweden's western coast. Carved out by glaciers and the sea, archipelagos dot the coastline, and on my last day there I hopped a train from the city center out to the town where the ferry departed. I spent the day alone, wandering the small villages, forests, and hills of those Swedish isles. In some ways it reminded me of visiting my grandparents when I was very young, who lived near the sea north of Boston, Massachusetts. In other ways it reminded me of no place I'd ever been before. Clouds rolled in and out over the rocky landscape, but it never rained and eventually the sun broke through and warmed me as I got lost in the forest, the high grass, and the many meandering inlets of the islands.

The Red House
On the island outside of Gothenburg, Sweden, I spotted a hill. Most of these islands are small and low lying, and the hills modest. But this one, carved from rock, pointing up from the sea, captivated me from as soon as I departed the ferry. I made a line for it and clambered up it's side. At the top was a tiny red house, more of a shack or a shed, really. I'm not sure what it's purpose was, whether it once operated as a lighthouse, or merely a one room place to lie down for a night and monitor the activity of the nearby islands. But when I crested the hill, I knew this was a place I'd remember forever. The clouds, a constant companion during my exploration of these small islands, had parted, drifting outward toward the horizon and letting the sun shine down. I looked out over the sea, across the numerous multicolored rooftops, and felt surprisingly at home in a place that also felt otherworldly. I let the sun warm me as I soaked in as much of the view as I could. The next morning I'd be leaving for Oslo. I might never make it back to this part of the world again, and I wanted to remember as much of it as I could.

The Archway
Perched high on a hill overlooking the old town in Gothenburg is a fortress. My first day there I climbed the hill, looking for the high ground to get views of the entire city. Gothenburg has countless hills and, to my delight, countless stairways leading up those hills. I spent the day climbing hills and visiting stone forts and wooden chapels, bridges over canals and streams and wandering through forested parks. This was still early in my trip and only in hindsight did I feel the presence of a wolf companion. I hadn't yet visited the places where my ancestors were from. But I felt like I was, in a way, retracing the steps of a much younger version of myself. Although I had never been to this part of the world before, I spent a formative part of my life traveling through Europe, largely on my own, and those travels shaped who I am and inspired me to make my very first paintings of astronauts. A lone traveler, lost in a world that is recognizable but not his own. History hangs over this place. It's not my history. But now that I've been there and seen it in person, it becomes part of my own story.

The Stairway
People who know me well know that my unusual pastime of choice is to walk stairs. I moved to Los Angeles from Boston around 5 years ago. When the pandemic hit, and I found myself locked in and bored, and I began walking the numerous stairs cut into the hills and mountains near my new home. When I arrived in Kaunas, Lithuania with my brother, after spending the previous days visiting smaller towns where our ancestors once lived, I was excited to find that Kaunas had hills and stairs of it's own. I spent our first night there tentatively exploring the ones nearest where we were staying, then my brother joined in the following morning as we explored the city from it's highest points, climbing hills to churches and monuments, statues and overlooks, occasionally hopping an ancient funicular along the way.
This particular stairway, captured that first night in town, was covered in graffiti and bright lights lit up the forest hanging above it. The wolf who appears in each painting in this show represents a few different things, but I think of it primarily as a ghost of my ancestors accompanying me on this trip where I visited the places they once lived. Vilkas means wolf in Lithuanian. And the names written on the wall are my direct patriarchal line. Listfield's starting with me and my brother, and going backwards – my father, my grandfather, my great-grandfather – all the way back in time, as far as I can trace. The ancestors who lived in this part of the world, those of us who had never been there, and then me and my brother, visiting for the first and maybe only time, to see the places where we come from.

The Wall
Unsurprisingly, when traveling through old European cities, I saw a lot of statues on this trip. Monuments to leaders long gone, kings and noblemen and warriors. A whole mythology to remember glorious achievements from the past. I also visited crumbling walls and overgrown sites of battles and massacres. Some were entirely unmarked. Left for nature to reclaim them. I visited places where distant family had been killed during various wars. Murdered for no real reason and tossed into a pit. These parts of my trip were sobering. In some of those places the memory burned bright. Statues and plaques and historical markers, so that no one would forget what had transpired. In other places there was less than nothing. Just roads to nowhere, overgrown forests, nothing at all to indicate the lives that had been fought for and lost in those places.I wanted to combine many of those things into one image in this painting. The crumbling walls, the statues, the forests and overgrown plots of land. I placed the name of my own ancestor on the statue. My third great grandfather's name was Wolfe. A coincidence I only realized later, after the wolf had already become the defining figure of this story. Wolfe led a modest life. He was a teacher in a small town in Lithuania. His son Chaim left for England, and a better life hopefully, and eventually he joined him there, in Leeds, where he passed in 1902. There is no monument to his struggle. I'm not sure there is even a gravestone. But here, in this painting, there is.
The Road
On the far outskirts of Kaunas, Lithuania is a place called the ninth fort. It was completed just before World War I and served as one of a series of defensive bastions for the city. When the Soviets swept in at the beginning of World War II, it became a jail for political prisoners. During the Nazi occupation later in the war it became a massacre site, mostly for the local Jewish population. I don't know if anyone in my family ended up there, but it's certainly possible. After the war, the Soviets reclaimed the site and erected a haunting monument to those lost in the Nazi massacre.This site was one of the more sobering stops on my trip, and yet I was captivated by the beauty of the monument itself. In this painting I've remade it, but placed it far from the manicured lawns and rolling hills of the site itself. The dusty road and high unkempt grass is from a different stop on our trip. Another massacre site. Another place my ancestors might have lived and might have died. This place was forgotten. No marker. No towering monument. Only forgotten memories. This trip, the good and the bad, the remembered and the forgotten, lies along that road. My brother and I followed it to wherever it went. We didn't know it at the time, but there was a wolf there, too. Sometimes it led and sometimes it followed. The wolf lived there, somewhere, along that road.
The Plaza
My trip wrapped up in Vilnius, Lithuania's stately capital city. Filled with towers and churches, monuments and plazas, my brother and I spent three days walking the city, coming to grips with the places we had seen on this trip. We had spent the previous week visiting smaller towns where our ancestors came from. In some of those places I felt the memory of that history, still alive and vibrant, despite there being no living members of my family still there. In other places, the history had been literally bulldozed. Empty fields and abandoned roads where people once lived and where people once died, overgrown cemeteries that in another generation or two will be lost forever. I felt caught between my own family history, the lives they lived, largely uncelebrated but key to my own existence, and the grandeur of monuments to cities and kings and saints. The two began to blend in my mind. This trip had been something like me creating a monument of my own to my past, my ancestry, to those who came from the small towns, to those who lived and dies, those who fled, and those who didn't make it out in time. There are monuments in my mind mind now also monuments in my paintings, to those people who came before me.
Enquire here to request details of available works by Scott
-
Whilst in London for his first show 'Tokyoverse' with StolenSpace, we took the opportunity to ask Geoffrey a few questions about his working practice and new body of work.
How has living and working in Japan influenced your life and artistic practice?I arrived in Japan when I was 21 years old. Since then, this country has deeply influenced my life and artistic practice. I have developed here, and the impact on my work is significant. I now consider myself more of a Japanese artist than French. My style is a blend of manga and the graphic style characteristic of contemporary Japanese painting. Takashi Murakami pioneered the "superflat" movement, where the painting is very flat, almost as if it were printed. My works exhibit this characteristic: they are very flat, without traces of brushstrokes. My black and white style also references manga pages, which are almost exclusively in black and white.
What does your creative process look like when conceptualising new pieces?When I conceive a new piece, I primarily focus on the overall composition. Finding a delicate balance is essential, regardless of the subject matter. I always start with a quick sketch, which I then rework several times until I achieve the desired result. As my work is almost always in black and white, line prevails over color; that's the aspect I primarily focus on. Then, I adopt a very minimalist approach. I work in a restricted space, which forces me to use few materials. I only need a few brushes, my pot of black and white, and that's it!
Who have been your biggest influences when developing your artistic language?This question is complex because I'm passionate about art and artists in general. I'm familiar with the biographies of artists, mainly from the 20th century. Therefore, they have all, in one way or another, influenced my work. Without going into too much detail, I can mention two who have particularly influenced my practice: Fernand Léger and Tomoo Gokita (one French and one Japanese!). Fernand Léger inspired me with the structured aspect of his forms and his "cylindrical" style, elements that are also present in my works. As for Tomoo Gokita, his strong use of contrast in his black and white paintings, as well as the way he manipulates light in his works, have been crucial aspects for me in my paintings in recent years.
For ‘Tokyoverse’ you aimed for a much more focused approach by removing context and backgrounds. What led you to this decision?I already partially answered this in the previous question, haha. However, there is another reason why I removed the background. Some time ago, my works were very complex, with very anarchic shapes where the subject often got lost in the background. It was difficult to distinguish the central character from the rest, which sometimes gave the impression of an abstract painting if one didn't pay attention. With "Tokyoverse," I am clearly paying homage to contemporary Japanese painting. I highlight female portraits in a clean and graphic style. So, I would conclude with the idea that "Less is More"
Enquire here to request details of available works by Scott
-
We met with Kai Clements who is behind the art of Kai & Sunny to take some time to immerse ourselves in the world of 'Elemental Mix'.
Please can you tell us the inspiration behind your new body of work 'Elemental Mix'?The inspiration for this new body of work focuses on how nature has the ability to change the way you feel. How we rely on nature for happiness in times of uncertainty. How you might feel when subjected to the force whilst surrounded by nature.
Can you describe the exhibition in 3 words?
Hypnotic - Calm - Kinetic

What inspires your colour choices for your artworks, and is there a specific focus on colour theory?
Colour is becoming more and more important in the paintings. The transition between colour is creating the movement and the mood. I like to use colours that compliment each other but mostly offset this with opposite colour usage i.e red and green. The colour combinations help the form and direction of the pieces and dictates the flow and energy. The colour combination also has the ability to interfere with the foreground and background and creates a sense of confusion.

How do you initially prepare for the composition of each piece?
Each painting starts with sketches to create the composition and over all shape. This is taken from observations around elements from nature. Once the piece is ready to paint I use bold painted layers behind working with colour gradients to create the flow and energy. The thinner lines are then applied on top to add to the movement and creates the over all mood of the painting.

How important is nature and our planet in the creation of your work?
Nature is the key element in the work but it’s the effect nature can have on us that is the interesting part. It’s about how nature can create positive energy and is important for our mental health.

How important is the collaboration between music and art in your work?
Working with Toydrum on the music for the show is such a positive element. Adding music enables you to go further and explore the energy and movement within the work. It enhances the experience.
Enquire here to request details of available works by Kai
-
we sat down with Ezra over a pizza and fired over some questions to get to know him a little better!
Tell us about a bit about yourself and your background.
I grew up in East Los Angeles and I went to the Academy of Arts in San Francisco to study art.
When did you first discover your interest in art and creativity? Which artists would you say are your key influences?
I first found my love for art around the age of 5. The biggest influence in my career was my father. He was always drawing and painting around me and my brothers. So I naturally gravitated towards the arts.
Where do you find inspiration or what motivates you to create? Explain how to be happy!
The inspiration for all of my art comes from everyday life. I tend to draw from emotions we have all gone through at one point in time in our lives. My motivation comes from the passion and love I have for creativity.
Could you tell us about your artistic process and how you would describe your style?
My process for creating a piece of art is quite simple, I create what and how I'm feeling. If that doesn't work then I think of a past experience and build from there. The style I draw and paint in is called rubber hose. It's a style that became popular in the 1920's. I've always loved artwork from that era, especially the cartoons.
In your solo show ‘I Used To Be Happy’, you paint a character ‘Happy The Clown’. What's the purpose or goal of portraying this character in your work?
Happy is a character loosely based on me and my emotions. I'm not good with wordsnor at expressing myself and especially when it comes to my mental health. That's why I felt it was easier to come up with a character to help my cope with my emotions. It was easier for me to paint and draw something than to write it down. I just didn't know it was going to have such a positive impact on people as it did. I've had people from all walks of life message me thanking me for creating artwork that was speaking on what they are going through.What are your future plans as an artist?
My plans for the future are to eventually have a larger platform to keep on creating and hopefully work with organizations to help make mental health awareness something everyone feels comfortable talking about. I would also love to continue to show my work overseas and connect with people from all over the world and share the love I have for art.